a
what was at stake
b
green position
c
what we achieved
d
what we did not achieve

Europe-wide lists for EU elections

Even though European elections are held Europe-wide, lists of candidates are still drawn up at national level or even within regions of Member States.

This hinders a truly European debate in the run-up to the elections and results in European elections easily being overshadowed by national politics.

Since 2008, Parliament has been working on a proposal to change this, namely by introducing a European list of 25 candidates, to be drawn up in parallel to the regular national lists.

Initial versions of the proposal necessitated amending European treaties. This made them controversial, especially among the conservative groups in Parliament. Consequently, for several years Parliament's position was referred back and forth between the plenary and the relevant committee.

 

What was the Greens' position?

The Greens believe that European elections deserve a truly European dimension.

European lists would be a good starting point for prompting debates that cross national borders and incorporate the full complexity of European politics.

Given the difficulty of amending treaties, we prefer a solution that is compatible with them and also permits transnational lists.

 

Did other MEPs accept the Greens' position?
The Parliament has not voted this text yet.

 

Which points did the Greens lose?
The Parliament has not voted this text yet.
Reference(s)
Videos
Press & Events
Committee:AFCO

Procedure:Own-initiative procedure

Reference(s):2009/2134(INI)

Lead MEP:Andrew Duff (ALDE)

Green MEP responsible:Gerald Häfner

Voted:28/04/2011

Staff contact:Guillaume Sellier (Email)
1 of 1

Outcome of the vote
Below you find the results of the final vote in plenary. How did the political groups vote? What about national delegations? And what was the position of your MEP?